The personal blog of Zoe Stavri. Astounded by how few people read “about” pages and then think they’ve magically “exposed” me. Part anarchist. Part feminist. All angry. Has too many psychology degrees. Likes brevity in internet profiles. Blogs a mishmash of feminism, psychology, politics and navel-gazing.
Another angry woman 
Your analysis of Sherlock 2.01 was flawless. Thank you.
Hey I really enjoy your writing, but I was wondering if you have an RSS feed hidden away somewhere? I can’t seem to find one.
Thanks for all your hard work!
For you and anyone else who can’t find the RSS link (it’s right at the bottom), the URL is: https://stavvers.wordpress.com/feed/
…Initially, I accidentally wrote ‘uberdeq’ for my email address(!) I am, what the fictional Jason King never actually was – a genuinely chauvinistic male. And I detest people with university degrees. I do, admire Virginia Woolf, and I think you are a very very good writer indeed. And I agree with a few others here that you are 100% correct with your analysis of Sherlock’s Adler. I could I suppose, drag myself to merit your academic prowess with a patient eyebrow lift.
J.
Just found this blog from Feministe – I’m glad to know another fellow anarcha-feminist! =] I identify as one as well.
You’re brilliant. Your eloquent rage makes my life better and, although the award itself might be too fluffy for you and the tough topics you cover, I couldn’t not offer it to you. So…
I’ve nominated you and your blog for the One Lovely Blog Award – love your writing and wanted to let you know.
http://circlesunderstreetlights.wordpress.com/2012/08/23/one-lovely-blog/
Irene Adler analysis was massively brilliant, totally right in every respect. Courage to those who are willing to see the obvious! Sherlock of a 100 years ago might even get your analysis. So why Moffat? The weak/dominating smart whore is still very sexy to entitled men. Uggh!
Well said :)<3
If you can forgive my irreverent sense of mirth, with your background as an angry, anarchistic feminist who is over-educated in psychology, my forthcoming book should be utter anathema to you. Always nice to have something to be angry about. }:-)>
May I respectfully inquire as to what too many degrees in psychology actually constitutes? For the record, I took intro psych as an elective back around the summer of 1986 or so. I consider myself to be over-educated in psychology as well.
Cheers.
As a fellow angry women, I’m so glad I discovered your blog.
A healthy vagina also has lots of bacteria and yeast as well, why not try bread-making with them? A quick swab or squirt of water up the cootchie, add water and flour and see what develops?
How many is too many psychology degrees?
Lots.
I’m just concerned for how you have enough vaginal yeast to make a sandwich
All of the information is there to read, if you google. Should you want more information, my time costs a very reasonable £40 a minute.