Sweden and rape: the myth of the feminist haven

National stereotypes of Sweden tend to involve pop music, loud jumpers, sexual liberation and a fairly good grasp of feminism and gender politics. Julian Assange labelled Sweden the “Saudi Arabia of feminism”, presumably due to their desire to ask him some tricky questions about the rapes he probably perpetrated.

A vital part of good gender politics is taking rape seriously. Rape is a frighteningly common occurrence, and is typically gendered. These issues must be dealt with sensitively. A few stories have come to my attention which suggest that Sweden is not doing very well at this at all. Trigger warnings apply for the remainder of this post, and any links.

In one case, a cis male perpetrator was acquitted for attempted rape because his survivor was a trans woman. The survivor had not had SRS, and did not have a vagina. The court ruled that because the perpetrator had set out to rape a woman and the survivor was not a woman the crime could not have possibly happened. This verdict seems to imply that, simply by being trans, a person cannot be raped. This “not a real woman” line rears its head from all corners, from the misogynists to some branches of radical feminism. It is a thoroughly repugnant, antediluvian mode of thought that needs to be extinguished.

Regardless of gender or sex, a person can be raped. That a court bought a defence that stated “actually, she turned out to be a man” suggests not only that trans women cannot be the targets of sexual abuse, but also cis men. The ruling reflects the patriarchal belief that rape is something that exclusively happens to women who make ideal victims.

Another case involves a young woman with Asperger’s who was raped. The perpetrator was acquitted as the Court of Appeal ruled that he could not read the woman’s expression due to her disability. This acquittal represents the swallowing of a different rape myth: that consent is the absence of a “no” rather than the presence of a “yes”. The implications of this case for other non-neurotypical survivors are quite, quite terrifying.

And of course, one can make the point that the allegations against Assange were not taken seriously by the authorities initially. While Assange’s cheerleaders like to suggest that this is due to some sort of evil conspiracy and the lying bitches were probably making the whole thing up anyway, there is a rather more mundane explanation for this: rape allegations against powerful men are seldom taken seriously. It was only as Assange’s star began to fall that Sweden began to take an interest.

A legal system is always inextricably bound up in the beliefs of the culture that created it. Rape culture is alive and well throughout the world, and therefore this damaging set of assumptions gains a degree of credibility as judges believe untruths and the minds of the lawmakers are swaddled in lies. Sweden is no different, and its implementation of “justice” is as likely to engage in rape apologism as any other legal system. It is not a haven of feminism, it is the same as anywhere else.


Many thanks to @konvention who linked me to the article about the woman with Asperger’s.

7 thoughts on “Sweden and rape: the myth of the feminist haven”

  1. Regarding the first case, the legal precedent being set is so astonishingly terrifying that I don’t think anyone in Sweden has fully thought it through.

    The argument “the survivor had no vagina, therefore rape could not have been carried out” essentially implies that if someone charged with attempted rape can demonstrate that the rape in question would have for some reason been prevented, then no crime could have been committed and thus no crime was committed.

    This, however, is utterly insane because every attempted rape case involves a rape that was somehow prevented – that’s exactly what the crime “attempted rape” is. Using this logic, no attempted rape case could ever be tried sucessfully. Its very definition includes the argument for its dismissal.

    The legal precedent being established is that ‘attempted rape’ is not a crime at all, but is in fact proof of the absence of a crime.

    1. From what I hear, they’re appealing, which I think they should. An attempted rape is always an attempted rape, regardless of the gender and a lot of people have been outraged after hearing about the case. They are correct, the rape did not take place so naturally the man should not be charged with that. Nevertheless, the intent was there and he intentionally beat her and ripped her clothes off, just to notice the male genitalia. So what? HE INTENDED TO RAPE HER AND PROCEDED IN BEATING AND FORCEFULLY UNDRESSING HER. That is attempted rape. Which IS a crime. Always. Without exeptions.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.