In the news today, a police officer tasered a blind man for walking down the street with a stick. Apparently the poor little copper was frightened by the victim’s white stick, and thought it was a samurai sword, so attacked him with a deadly weapon. The context behind this event was that the police had heard that apparently someone was wandering around with a samurai sword, which really doesn’t give the copper any excuse because the sticks used by blind people to navigate look exactly fuck all like a samurai sword.
Now this is hardly the first time a police officer has developed very questionable judgment of the nature of a threat: recall the case of Delroy Smellie, who beat the fuck out of a woman for waving a juice box. He told the court that he’d thought it was a weapon–a fucking juice box!–and was acquitted.
Obviously, I’m hardly going to rule out the parsimonious explanation that these cops are simply just lying bastards. However, even the nice cops will be susceptible to this effect, as once again science proves that all coppers are bastards (for those interested in more science about why the police differ from the non-porcine population, please read this overview).
A study conducted this year–unfortunately paywalled, but summarised here–found that when people are holding a weapon, they are more likely to think that others are holding weapons. They’re also more likely to get jumpy.
The participants in this study were given one of two objects to hold: a foam ball, or a toy gun. They were then shown people holding objects: sometimes neutral, like drink cans, but sometimes guns. Those who were holding toy guns were far more likely to classify the innocuous objects as guns. There was no effect if the toy gun was just near the participant, rather than in their hands.
Furthermore–and this bit is less clear in both the abstract of the study and the summary–participants were more likely to raise the toy gun in response to a perceived “threat”: again, remember this “threat” is nothing more than a drink can.
The researchers concluded that this effect is due to perceiving the environment in terms of intended action: by holding the gun, people switched into an “I intend to use this gun” frame of mind, and began to see the world differently and seeing people as threats.
Now think about how this applies to the police, a group who are typically armed as part of the job. They walk around with batons incredibly close to their hands, and are sometimes instructed to draw them as part of standard public order procedure. When even normal people suddenly start perceiving the world as being full of threats and weapons, is it really any surprise that the cops do routinely?
It’ll only get worse if Bernard Hogan-Howe gets his way; he wants to stick a taser in every police car, which will likely result in increasingly edgy and trigger-happy cops whizzing round London. I can’t say I’m comfortable with this.
There’s a decent explanation for police being trigger-happy, but this doesn’t make it right in the slightest. In fact, it’s an argument to move towards disarming the police force: keep the weapons hard to get hold of, and maybe they’ll stop harming innocents.
Thanks @gmartin for telling me about this study
7 thoughts on “Police taser a blind guy: there’s a scientific reason they’re bastards here”
Not sure if it is before your time but there is also the case of Harry Stanley, which adds a lovely veneer of racism to the trigger happiness. ( The informant believed he was Irish, which of course was proof enough he must be carrying a gun.) http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3965207.stm
Thanks for this! I hadn’t seen this story, but it’s certainly fitting.
Harry Stanley was a Scot, shot in the back by the Met in Hackney in 1999 coming home from the pub carrying a chair leg (wrapped, as I recall, in a plastic bag. He was taking it homw to repair for his brother-in-law. Police claimed they had a tip off about an Irishman carrying a gun. The coppers were cleared and the police Federation complained about how it took. Chumbawamba song ‘without reason or rhyme ‘ is about his murder.
check this shit out: http://dotsub.com/view/d790b74b-7c1c-4e62-8e17-7856b3f27022 a police expert going through the numbers on pepper spray and tazer use.
Have you heard about the case of the Brazilian student in Sydney who was tasered 14 times by 11 officers? The student then died, though allegedly the tasering had nothing to do with it…
The filth were standing around this fella who was on the ground, and just repeatedly tasering him. Latest article from the ABC: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-10-17/27no-proof27-tasers-killed-brazilian-student/4318098
> Thanks @gmartin for telling me about this study
I heard about that man with the chair leg. Why not just taser cops to let them know how it feels ? before they get to use them. same for the politicians who give them these OFFENSIVE weapons. too out of touch all of them. PLEASE DON’T VOTE FOR ANYONE.